AI Judgement: Mistral Large 2 vs Cohere Command R+
Command R+ (Cohere) prevails over Mistral Large 2 (Mistral AI) model at the AI Judgement task
Rationality and Logic: Command R+ ≛ Mistral Large 2
- Both show strong analytical capabilities in ethical dilemmas and identify logical fallacies accurately
- Mistral Large 2 tends to be more verbose and sometimes redundant
- Command R+ occasionally overcomplicates simple scenarios
Impartiality: Command R+ ≛ Mistral Large 2
- Both consistently recognize conflicts of interest and need for recusal
- Both maintain strong ethical standards in decision-making
- Command R+ shows excessive caution in some scenarios
- Mistral Large 2 sometimes shows inconsistency in detail level between options
Deterrence and Marginality: Command R+ > Mistral Large 2
- Both excel at recognizing marginal differences
- Command R+ is better at suggesting alternative selection methods
- Mistral Large 2 sometimes over-analyzes marginal cases
Consistency: Command R+ > Mistral Large 2
- Both maintain consistent ethical principles across scenarios and provide clear reasoning for decisions
- Command R+ shows slight edge in consistency in applying standards
- Mistral Large 2 varies in analysis depth between similar cases
Ethical Considerations: Command R+ ≛ Mistral Large 2
- Both show strong grasp of ethical principles and maintain a professional tone throughout
- Both handle whistleblowing and bias scenarios well
- Mistral Large 2 sometimes too cautious in clear ethical violations
- Command R+ occasionally overemphasizes theoretical frameworks
Overall: Command R+ ≳ Mistral Large 2
The margin is small, but Command R+ demonstrates slightly better characteristics at consistency and deterrence in marginal cases. We declare Command R+ a prevailing AI for AI Judgement trial, however, both models show strong potential for AI-driven arbitration.