Summarizing Articles: DuckDuckGo & GPT-4o mini vs DuckDuckGo & Claude 3 Haiku

Results of a face-off between DuckDuckGo AI Chat with GPT-4o mini and Claude 3 Haiku models at Summarizing Articles with AI-Powered Content Condensation Trial.

Conciseness: GPT-4o mini > Claude 3 Haiku

• GPT-4o mini consistently produced more concise summaries while maintaining essential information
• Claude 3 Haiku's summaries were often longer and included unnecessary details

Accuracy and Objectivity: Claude 3 Haiku ≳ GPT-4o mini

• Claude 3 Haiku's summaries generally provided more specific and verifiable information
• Both models maintained objectivity and avoided introducing bias
• GPT-4o mini sometimes presented more general or vague information

Coherence and Readability: GPT-4o mini ≛ Claude 3 Haiku

• Both models produced well-structured and easy-to-read summaries
• Claude 3 Haiku's use of numbered points or paragraphs sometimes enhanced readability

Balance of Completeness and Relevance: Claude 3 Haiku ≳ GPT-4o mini

• Claude 3 Haiku often provided more comprehensive coverage of key points and specific details
• GPT-4o mini's summaries, while relevant, sometimes missed crucial aspects or nuances

Convenience and Ease of Use: GPT-4o mini ⋙ Claude 3 Haiku

• Claude 3 Haiku was unable to access more than half of the test articles
• User experience is the same with Duck Duck Go AI Chat web interface

Conclusion: GPT-4o mini ≫ Claude 3 Haiku

While Claude 3 Haiku had a slight edge in completeness and accuracy, this model selection could not access most article links. Therefore, we declare Duck Duck Go Chat & GPT-4o mini the winner in this face-off.